From a5948c0ca573c0f45d4e0670f85cd4ad3f77b0fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ken Kellner Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 08:59:34 -0500 Subject: Fix braces in Rd --- DESCRIPTION | 2 +- man/MesoCarnivores.Rd | 12 ++++++------ man/occuFP.Rd | 2 +- man/unmarked-package.Rd | 2 +- tests/testthat/test_distsampOpen.R | 2 +- 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/DESCRIPTION b/DESCRIPTION index 6c9614f..1e52b57 100644 --- a/DESCRIPTION +++ b/DESCRIPTION @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Package: unmarked Version: 1.4.0 -Date: 2024-01-05 +Date: 2024-01-08 Type: Package Title: Models for Data from Unmarked Animals Authors@R: c( diff --git a/man/MesoCarnivores.Rd b/man/MesoCarnivores.Rd index c51e06f..8d274a4 100644 --- a/man/MesoCarnivores.Rd +++ b/man/MesoCarnivores.Rd @@ -18,12 +18,12 @@ \item{\code{redfox}}{A 1437x3 occupancy matrix for red fox} \item{\code{sitecovs}}{A data frame containing covariates for the 1437 sites, with the following columns: \itemize{ - \item{\code{Dist_5km}{Proportion of disturbed land in 5 km radius}} - \item{\code{HDens_5km}{Housing density in 5 km radius}} - \item{\code{Latitude}{Latitude / 100}} - \item{\code{Longitude}{Longitude / 100}} - \item{\code{People_site}{Number of photos of people at site / 1000}} - \item{\code{Trail}{1 if camera was on trail, 0 if not}} + \item{\code{Dist_5km}}{Proportion of disturbed land in 5 km radius} + \item{\code{HDens_5km}}{Housing density in 5 km radius} + \item{\code{Latitude}}{Latitude / 100} + \item{\code{Longitude}}{Longitude / 100} + \item{\code{People_site}}{Number of photos of people at site / 1000} + \item{\code{Trail}}{1 if camera was on trail, 0 if not} } } } diff --git a/man/occuFP.Rd b/man/occuFP.Rd index 64feff2..daadb4e 100644 --- a/man/occuFP.Rd +++ b/man/occuFP.Rd @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ are specified to belong to 1 of the 3 data types and all or a subset of the data For type 1 data, the detection process is assumed to fit the assumptions of the standard MacKenzie model where false negative probabilities are estimated but false positive detections are assumed not to occur. If all of your -data is of this type you should use code{occu} to analyze data. The detection parameter p, which is modeled using the +data is of this type you should use \code{occu} to analyze data. The detection parameter p, which is modeled using the detformula is the only observation parameter for these data. For type 2 data, both false negative and false positive detection probabilities are estimated. If all data is of this diff --git a/man/unmarked-package.Rd b/man/unmarked-package.Rd index 3bf8db0..c0595a3 100644 --- a/man/unmarked-package.Rd +++ b/man/unmarked-package.Rd @@ -260,6 +260,6 @@ Sillett, S. and Chandler, R.B. and Royle, J.A. and Kery, M. and \docType{package} -\author{Ian Fiske, Richard Chandler, Andy Royle, Marc K\'{e}ry, David +\author{Ian Fiske, Richard Chandler, Andy Royle, Marc Kery, David Miller, and Rebecca Hutchinson} \keyword{package} diff --git a/tests/testthat/test_distsampOpen.R b/tests/testthat/test_distsampOpen.R index bd25e8b..2797b80 100644 --- a/tests/testthat/test_distsampOpen.R +++ b/tests/testthat/test_distsampOpen.R @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ test_that("distsampOpen dynamics models work",{ fm <- distsampOpen(~1, ~1, ~1, data = umf, K=25, keyfun="unif", dynamics="autoreg") - expect_equivalent(coef(fm), c(1.518686, -0.018026, -5.628779), tol=1e-5) + expect_equivalent(coef(fm), c(1.518686, -0.018026, -5.628779), tol=1e-4) #Sketchy estimates #Maybe just because data were simulated using a different process? -- cgit v1.2.3