aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--README.md4
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index b7ab418..54872ee 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
imperfect-detection
===================
+[![](https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5281/zenodo.154684.svg)](http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.154684)
+
A quantitative literature review of ecological statistical methods accounting for imperfect detection. We read 500+ ecology papers from 40+ years (collected using a stratified sampling method) and assessed which papers accounted for imperfect detection, if necessary. Probability that a paper accounted for imperfect detection was modeled as a function of several covariates including year, journal type, and the taxa studied. We used a hierarchical logistic regression model fit in a Bayesian framework.
The results are published in the following article:
-[*Kellner, Kenneth F.; Swihart, Robert K. 2014. Accounting for imperfect detection in ecology: a quantitative review. PLoS ONE 9(10): e111436. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111436*](http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0111436)
+[*Kellner, Kenneth F.; Swihart, Robert K. 2014. Accounting for imperfect detection in ecology: a quantitative review. PLoS ONE 9(10): e111436.*](http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0111436)
Metadata
====================